While it’s debatable whether or not the
songwriting, performing and arranging
skills of the average musician have
consistently improved over the years – in fact,
some would categorically argue that they’ve
got worse – it’s widely assumed that music
production standards have improved.
Even
played through the cheapest speakers or
headphones, mixes from ten, 20 and 30 years
ago have a very different sound to those that
are being created today, and – on a technical
level at least – you’ll often hear it said that
songs that are released now sound “better”
than those from the past.
Indeed, in most
cases, they certainly sound more polished.
However, although there are rules that can be
applied to it and techniques that can be learnt, music
production is not an exact science.
One person’s
understanding and opinion of what sounds
‘good’ might be completely different to
someone else’s, and it’s tempting to ascribe
quality to something simply because it sounds
familiar and ‘of its time’.
It’s worth asking, then, if music production
values really have improved. And, if they have,
how much better can they get before some sort
of quality ceiling might be reached?
Mixes from the 80s and early 90s are
often really bright with clicky bass drums and
ridiculous snares.
Particularly before that period, records often
sound unfinished because there are so
many things that you could do now to improve
them technically.
Go back 20 years and it’s even more
marked. In part, this is down to analogue desks,
and tape in particular rounding off the edges.
So, is it really true to say that today’s mixes are
technically better than those from the past?